Why Does God Ask Questions

Have you ever asked the question:

“Why does God ask questions?”

Genesis 3:9 says,

“Then the LORD God called to Adam and said to him,
‘Where are you?’”.  

Two verses later God poses two more questions. In verse 11 God asks Adam,

“Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you that you should not eat?”

As we look thru the scriptures one of the interesting things we find is that God asks quite a few questions. In Genesis 3:9 God asks Adam, “Where are you?”. Later in verse 11 God asks how Adam found out he was naked and if Adam had done what he was told not to. Jesus was certainly no different than His Father. A quick scan of the Gospels shows us Jesus would oftentimes ask questions. In Matthew 7:9 Jesus asks, “What man is there among you who, if his son asks for bread, will give him a stone?”. More prominently, Jesus posed a question from the cross. Mark 15:34 records the most important question ever asked:

And at the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying, “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?” which is translated, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?”

Let’s focus on this last question in order to answer our question. Why would God, In the person of Jesus, need to ask a question? Didn’t He know the plan? Didn’t Jesus know why the Father had forsaken Him? To answer this we have to realize that Jesus wasn’t the first person to ask the question. He was actually quoting from Psalm 22. It starts like this:

My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me? 

Why are You so far from helping Me, 

And from the words of My groaning?

O My God, I cry in the daytime, but You do not hear; 

And in the night season, and am not silent.

But You are holy, Enthroned in the praises of Israel.

Our fathers trusted in You; They trusted, and You delivered them.

They cried to You, and were delivered; 

They trusted in You, and were not ashamed.

But I am a worm, and no man; 

A reproach of men, and despised by the people.

All those who see Me ridicule Me; 

They shoot out the lip, they shake the head, saying,

"He trusted in the LORD, let Him rescue Him; Let Him deliver Him, since He delights in Him!"

Psalm 22 is actually a prophecy. It describes in amazingly accurate detail how the Messiah would be treated. It was written from a human experience, but with a recognizably prophetic purpose. When Jesus quoted this Psalm from the cross he was actually teaching. Any Jew who was listening should have recognized the Psalm and realized that the scriptures had described this very event hundreds of years before. They should have immediately understood, even if they had never met Jesus before, they were witnessing the persecution of God’s Anointed. Jesus wasn’t asking questions to find out the answer. He was asking questions to reveal the truth. That was the purpose of God’s questions in Genesis. That is the purpose of any question God asks. God’s questions aren’t for His education. They are for ours.

What question has God posed to you lately?

Freedom from Sexual Consequence

The current scandal involving the United States Marine Corps is the direct result of a society that holds Freedom from Sexual Consequence as an inalienable right.

For those who are catching up, apparently various Marines posted photos they received from ex-wives, ex-girlfriends (if you count one night stands), or former sexting partners across several internet discussion boards and Facebook groups.  Some of these posts include names and personal information on the women in the photos as well rank and duty assignments of some of the women who were or are current service members.  The Department of Defense is conducting an investigation into the existence of these internet posts to determine whether criminal prosecution of any of the men involved is possible.  Now, Congress has become involved in the issue.  During the Senate's hearings, this past Tuesday, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand made a splash as she spoke harshly to Marine General Robert Neller.  The Honorable Mrs. Gillibrand called the General's testimony "unacceptable" as he was unable to point to a commander or officer who had been found guilty of allowing such an atrocity to take place.  Who should be found guilty for allowing such an atrocity to take place?

Now, let us examine some ugly truths.

1.  The men looking at these photos on the internet are wrong.

"You have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not commit adultery.'  But I say to you that whoeer looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart." - Jesus

2.  The Marines sharing these photos on the internet are wrong.

"Temptation to sin are sure to come, but woe to the one through whom they come!  It would be better fro him if a milstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin." - Jesus

3.  The women who sent these photos to men they weren't married to are wrong.

  "It is what proceeds out of the man (or woman) that defiles the man (or woman).  For from witin, out of the heart of men (or women) proceed the eviil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deeit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness.  All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man (or woman)." - Jesus

Those biblical truths cannot be escaped.  Of course, we sure have tried. This whole scandal is a result of our culture raising an entire generation to value freedom from sexual consequence.  We have taught the young people of this generation that there is nothing wrong with pornography.  We have said that it does not inherently devalue women in the eyes of the men who look at it.  We have said that the 30% of women in America who view pornography on a weekly basis are in no way inhibiting their abilities to make moral decisions.  We have said that by releasing them from their inhibitions we are empowering them.  We have said that doing what God says not to should have no consequences.

We have taught them that there is nothing wrong with premarital sex and consequently having multiple sexual partners throughout the course of their lives.  We have taught that sexual promiscuity is desirable and divorce is acceptable while lifelong monogamy is mythical and to be derided.  We have said that calling sex liberating instead of sacred will in no way negatively impact our society as a whole.  We have said that doing what God says not to should have no consequences.

We (as a society) have said that God is not the Absolute Moral Judge when it comes to sex.  The problem then comes down to where we as a society draw the line.  This is the issue with graduated morals and slippery slopes: People fall down.

I know what moral liberalism's argument is.  They would say that the issue here is not one of God or moral absolutes but one of consent.  They would say that the women in these photos consented for the men to keep these photos for personal use only and therefore the men had no right to post them to the internet.  The thought being that a person has the right to place limits on how their image is to be used even after they give it to someone else.  I would say that I am using the same argument.

"So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them." - God

Our Schools Don't Need Jesus!

Our Schools Don’t Need Jesus!

It’s 3:34 a.m. as I am writing this.  I’m probably too tired for this rant to be advised. However, here it is.  I’ve noticed lately several of my Facebook friends saying that our schools need Jesus.  I disagree wholeheartedly.  For far too long we as parents and as a society at large have expected the government (our schools) to give our children what is our responsibility to give.  Our schools have proven themselves inept at integrating simple multiplication into our children’s lives.  I shudder to imagine the mess they would make with Christ.

Our schools do not need Jesus.  Our homes need Jesus.  I look around me and see parents teaching children that Jesus is a priority only when He is convenient to our schedules and our bank accounts.  I see parents teaching that ball games, birthday parties, and drama club are all ample reasons to forsake the sacred assembly of the Body of Christ.  I see parents teaching children that God comes first on Sunday’s and Wednesdays for an hour and fifteen minutes (we can’t tolerate a service if it runs longer than that) but not Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday, or Saturday.  We don’t need Jesus in our schools.  We need Jesus in the foremost position of our priorities.

Our days are spent beholding Facebook or our TVs instead of beholding the Lamb of God.  Even during worship services and Bible studies we have phones in front of our faces.  We don’t need Jesus in our schools.  We need Him in our hands in the form of our Bibles (He is the Word of God).  I’m sure some of us really are looking at our Bible App during church, (but many are checking Facebook when the preaching fails to keep our interest).  I know this because I see you thumb-scrolling for twenty-five straight minutes and if you had ever tolerated reading that much of the Bible in one sitting your life would be different than it is now.  Can you imagine what would happen if our children saw us reading our Bibles as much as they saw us reading our phones?  What would our future look like if we shared Christ with them as often as we share posts on Facebook.  Dare to think of a day when they saw us searching God’s Word for His Truth with the same vigor we scour Pinterest for art and craft projects.  We don’t need Jesus in our schools.  We need Jesus in our thoughts and on our lips.

Our pulpits are filled with men and women (unfortunately in the latter case) who are more worried about attendance numbers, offering totals, and how people feel than preaching the Word.  Our sermons focus on how to have good lives rather than the Good Shepherd and eternal life.  We refuse to rebuke and exhort as we should because then someone might get offended and leave.  We don’t need Jesus in our schools.  We need Jesus in our pastors and elders.  Our deacons are lazy and more concerned with acting as a board of administrators than serving the body as they should.  Our worship leaders are concerned with sounding relevant to the unsaved instead of bolstering the Word as they steer Christ’s Church in worship.  Our youth directors are more concerned with developing programs and content that is popular with young people than developing disciples and freeing them from the popular culture.  We don’t need Jesus in our schools.  We need Jesus in the leaders of our local church congregations.

Were educators to “put Jesus back in our schools” they could not do so legally without placing him on equal ground with Mohammed, Buddha, Brahma, Gia, or any other deity that is the focus of any other religion.  We as parents certainly have no room to complain about that.  We place Him on equal ground with Santa Claus, finances, television schedules, spouses, jobs, sports, houses, automobiles, happiness, education, and any one of the countless other things we spend our time, energy and effort on instead of Him.  He deserves more.  He is King of Kings and Lord of Lords.  We don’t need Jesus in our schools.  We need Jesus in our living rooms.  We need Jesus in our hearts when we lie down and when he rise up.  We need Jesus in words when we go in and when we come out.  We need Jesus in our actions as we set about our days.

We don’t need Jesus in our schools.  We need Jesus in our children.  And only we can introduce them to Him.  If we do this they will carry Jesus with them when they go to school and no one would be able to take them from His hand (the change in possessive pronouns was intentional).

Yours In Christ,

R. Scott Thomas, Chief Among Sinners

Can Apes Read Minds?

     Science (true science) is the systematic study of the world through observation and experimentation. It is essentially the human condition's logical attempt to find truth; and I love it. After all, the truth shall set you free (John 8:32).

“So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed him, 'If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.'”

     The problem I face comes from the growing trend that MOST people who practice science, particularly as a profession, don't do it very well. Case in point would be a recent study on primate cognitive abilities. The study was designed to find evidence in support of the current evolutionary model rather than the truth.  The result, as summarized in this Science magazine article written by Virginia Morell, is one of the worst examples of science I have ever seen. Yet, it is hailed as groundbreaking. 

     The article states that “evolutionary anthropologists” have determined chimpanzees, bonobos, and orangutans are able to understand when someone else holds a false belief. This is an ability previously only ascribed to humans. The study seeks to prove that we share this ability with apes. This shared ability would then further support the theory of common ancestry between apes and humans (the current modern evolutionary model). This pseudo-empathy was tested by having a man place a rock in a box while an ape watched. Then, under ape observation, another man in a monkey (ape-like) costume would hide the rock in a different box before “changing his mind,” and absconding with the rock altogether. When the rocks original owner (not the guy in the monkey costume) returned, eye tracking technology reported that of the apes stared at the box they saw the human place the rock in. This behavior was interpreted to mean that the apes knew the rock's original owner held a false belief.

Absurdity abounds. That being said, let us come now to the rat killing:

1. Bias is shown firstly by the fact that the study is being carried out by “evolutionary anthropologists.” We have a problem when the person who is attempting to prove a theory actually constructs their identity based upon that theory. Let me put it this way: Is a self identified, “Bigfoot Hunter” ever going to come to the conclusion that there is no such thing as Bigfoot?

2. The ape staring at the last object it saw an individual interact with is hardly evidence of cognitive application of empathy. It could be that, or it could just be the ape held spacial association between that man and the last place the ape saw the man go.

3. While 57% does constitute a majority response, it isn't consistent enough to show a uniformed or predictable behavior that should be considered as conclusive evidence of an abstract emotional construct.

4. Even if the behavior was observed throughout 100% of the trials, the assertive leap attributing it to the ape realizing the man had a false-belief is too far to be logical. It is in fact, an act of faith not inference.

5. A man in a monkey suit. Really?

     Please understand, the issue does not lie quite in how the study was presented in Ms. Morell's article. She did a fine job of presenting dissenting opinions. The problem lies in the general state of scientific study. This study was designed to prove a theory, not test it. That is where we are at. Modern “scientists” seek only to further their chosen faith (evolution). Real science, unbiased study of the world around us in pursuit of the truth, will always point back to the One True God (Romans 1). Maybe that's why scientists have abandoned science. Perhaps we should start calling them “apologists”.

“If you put these things before the brothers, you will be a good servant of Christ Jesus, being trained in the words of the faith and of the good doctrine that you have followed. Have nothing to do with irreverent, silly myths. “
                    - 1 Timothy 4:6,7

What the Pope Doesn't Know About Marriage

Marriage…Marriage is what brings us together today.  The Princess Bride has some of my favorite quotable lines from any movie.  However, the sermon issued during the wedding which gives us the very title of the movie contains perhaps the greatest line. 

“Mawage. Mawage is wot bwings us togeder tooday. Mawage, that bwessed awangment, that dweam wifin a dweam...”

These words of the comically inept clergyman in the big funny hat ring hilarious because of the context they are bumbled in.  I assume when William Golding wrote the line he intended the reaction to be laughter.  He succeeded.  Now I would like to turn your attention to some other words about marriage bumbled forth by an inept clergyman in a funny hat.  Unfortunately, I don’t believe these words were intended to be funny.  They certainly aren’t.

According to Michelle Boorstein of the Washington Post, Pope Francis has issued a shocking statement about marriage.  In her article, dated June 17^th, she quotes Pope Francis as saying, “[People] don’t know that [marriage] is indissoluble, they don’t know that it’s for your entire life.  It’s hard”.  The pontiff’s conclusion then is that “the great majority,” of Catholic marriages are religiously null because people don’t understand what they are getting themselves into.

How foolish.  Here this man, who claims to speak for God, would teach that morality is relative.  He claims that what is right or wrong is based upon and individual’s understanding of it.  Let’s keep everyone holy.  Using this logic, the best thing the Pope could do would be to stop teaching what the Bible says.  Then no one would sin because no one would know what sin is.

Relative morality is nothing new.  It’s accepted abundance in the church is.  Paul predicted this apostasy.  He explained why and how it would come about.  Peter and John did also.  Of course, you’d have to read the Bible to know that.  On second thought, maybe the best thing the Pope could do really would be to stop teaching what the Bible says.

A Cautionary Tale

Recently a friend of mine found a video on social media and asked me to comment on it.  I encourage you to watch the video.  The video is short excerpt from a 35 minute interview with Mr. Mario Joseph.  Mr. Joseph was previously a Muslim Imam (religious teacher/priest).  The full-length video can be found here.

I found the video very uplifting.  However there were a few points that I felt could be very misleading.  Mr. Joseph describes how during his study of the Quran he began to question the teachings of Islam after noticing superiority in the person of Jesus when compared to Mohammed.  At around 10:30 into the video Mr. Joseph makes the statement, “So if you ask me who made me Christian, it’s not any fathers; it’s not any sisters; it’s not any bishops; it’s not any cardinals; it’s not even the Pope; but the holy Quran converted me to Christianity”.   However, Mr. Joseph goes on to describe how it was only after beginning to study the Bible that he truly became a Christian.

I feel the need to take time and dwell on this point.  If someone were to only listen to the first part of his interview they might perhaps take Mr. Joseph’s poorly constructed thought literally.  However, I cannot stress enough that it was not the Quran that brought Mr. Joseph to Christ.  Nor do I think it was ultimately his goal to communicate such an idea.  It was the Bible.  Mr. Joseph’s experience with the Quran was by definition one of contradiction.  And, a critical examination of his words reveal that the Quran’s lack of harmony (as was pointed out to him by God’s Holy Spirit) simply opened him up to receive God’s Word (the Bible). The Gospel had to be presented for Mr. Joseph to be saved.  As Mr. Joseph received the Word he was given understanding by the Holy Spirit.  It was that relationship with God's True Word which brought him a point of faith.

"faith comes by hearing; and hearing comes by the Word of God." (Romans 10:17)

My fear is that someone might begin to ascribe a position to the Quran which it is not due.  It is not another “Holy Scripture”.  The Quran is not God’s Word.  Holy enlightenment is not found through it.  We must not view it in the same light as the Bible. The two texts contradict one another and cannot abide in harmony.  If one must be right then the other must be wrong. Perspective is important here.  As Christians you must eventually (hopefully early) come to a point in the development of our faith when we answer the question:

Do I believe the Bible?

If you do then the only logical conclusion is that the Quran is a lie.  If the Quran is a lie it cannot be the Word of God.  If the Quran is not the Word of God then faith could not be found through the study of the Quran.  I do not believe that Mr. Joseph was attempting to say such.  However, his message could easily be misconstrued to say such.  That is why I issue such a warning.

You might ask, “Why does it matter?”  The answer is paramount to spiritual well being.  If we look to the Quran as a source of illumination (truth) then we risk being trapped in its lies.  In other words, what measurements can be coming from an unbalanced scale?The greatest illustration to this may lie in what Mr. Joseph did not discuss. What else does the Quran say about Jesus?

1.  Christ the son of Mary was no more than a messenger; many were the messengers that passed away before him. His mother was a woman of truth. They had both to eat their (daily) food. See how Allah doth make His signs clear to them; yet see in what ways they are deluded away from the truth! (5:575, Yusif Ali)

2. The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say.Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! (9:30, Yusif Ali)

3.  Such (was) Jesus the son of Mary: (it is) a statement of truth, about which they (vainly) dispute.35 It is not befitting to (the majesty of) Allah that He should beget a son. Glory be to Him! when He determines a matter, He only says to it, "Be", and it is. (19:34-35, Yusif Ali)

4. That they rejected Faith; That they uttered against Mary A grave false charge;  That they said (in boast):  'We killed Christ Jesus The son of Mary, The Messenger of Allah.'  But they killed him not, Nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjunction to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.  Nay, Allah raised him up Unto Himself; and Allah Is Exalted in Power, Wise.  And there is none of the people of the book (Jews and Christians) But must believe in him  (Jesus) Before his death; And on the Day of Judgment He (Jesus) will be a witness Against them. (4:156-159, Yusif Ali)

You see, the Quran explicitly states that Jesus was not the Son of God who died on a cross as the sacrifice for our sins.  In fact, it says God has no Son.  It states that Jesus was just a messenger.  The Quran further claims that Jesus was never crucified and, in fact, never died.  How can such a statement be brought into harmony with a Gospel that says I may have eternal life because Christ died as my propitiation? The Quran could not in any way deny the redemptive work of the Gospel more than it already does.  The Quran is a lie.  It is a tool used to lead many people astray from the will of God.  For that reason I am very particular to in stating that no one has found salvation in it.  If any man has faith in Christ as his Lord, Savior, Redeemer, and Only Begotten Son of the Most High God it is because of the Holy Spirit convicting him through flood of Christian voices which have permeated this world with the Gospel of Salvation.  Seek truth in the Bible; not the Quran.  I want to leave you with the Truth.  

“Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son. Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father; the one who confesses the Son has the Father all”. - 1 John 2:22,23 (NASB)

What is Love?

Perhaps no other subject throughout human history has been written about as much as love.  People are captured by the idea of love.  As a society we spend untold hours and billions of dollars on the subject.  Our heroes seek it.  Our bards opine it.  Our youth are inundated with its value.  Countless authors have written myriads of books revolving around this universal subject.  And problem with all of these conditions is most of us have no idea what love really is.  God’s spoken word authored this world.  It would then stand to reason that He has the authority to define the seemingly most captivating subject within it.  So, what does God say love is?

First I want to point out that love is a commandment.  Look with me at Deuteronomy 6:5

You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength.

It is given to us as a commandment again in Leviticus 19:18

You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the children of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the Lord.

You see, love is given to us in the law as a commandment.  The implication then is that love is an action you commit.  If God did not command that we have an emotional response to him,  He commanded us to action.  So many times in marital counseling someone will say, “I just don’t love him anymore,” or, “We just don’t love each other the way we used too.”  I inevitably find myself wanting to scream, “Then you better start right now.”  Contrary to what this world wants to sell you, love is not an emotion.  Desire is an emotion.  Happiness is an emotion.  Infatuation is an emotion.  Love is an action.    Love is not something you fall into.  Love is not something that finds you.  Love is not something you find.  Love is something that you are commanded to do. 

This means that when your spouse does something you don’t like you still have to love them.  This means that when someone betrays your trust you still have to love them.  It is a scary concept.  It means you are responsible and accountable for whom you choose to love.  There is suddenly no acceptable reason for not loving; anyone.  Accepting love as a commandment changes the horizon.  Suddenly, love has nothing to do with an inexpiable force.  Suddenly no one is a victim.  Suddenly love is no longer something that happens to you; but something you do.   Suddenly you are empowered to love the way God intended.

Love is not just a commandment.  Love is the greatest commandment. It is preeminent above all other aspects of God’s law.  When asked the greatest commandment Christ points towards love.  As a matter of fact in Matthew Chapter 22 Verses 37 through 40 he states that all the law hangs upon the precept of love.

And Jesus said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.  This is the first and great commandment.  And the second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself.  On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.

Christ showed that love is very foundation of the old covenant which God established with Israel.  But, in John Chapter 15 Verse 3, He gave it as His own personal commandment to His disciples.

This is My commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you.  Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one’s life for his friends.

Love’s prominence then as a commandment is astounding.  It is the most inescapable aspect of God’s communion with mankind through His Word.  However, it goes far beyond God’s chief concern of our conduct.  Under the New Covenant love becomes the out-pouring of the new creation we are in Christ Jesus.  According to Paul’s letter to the Galatians love is the fruit which the Holy Spirit produces within us.  Chapter 5 Verses 22 and 23 read as such:

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long suffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control.  Against such there is no law. 

Not only is love given as on of the fruits the Holy Spirit produces in our lives, it is given as the first of these.  Love’s place among these most profound gifts is solidified in the 1 Corinthians 13:1-3.  Here Paul, in some of the most beautiful language of the entire Bible, forever shows love is not only a fruit of the Spirit.  Love is the preeminent fruit of the Spirit.

Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal.  And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.  And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, but have not love, it profits me nothing.

Wow, the escalation of love’s prominence keeps going.  To see love as the greatest fruit borne by the Holy Spirit is to begin to appreciate its importance in the life of a believer.  In fact, love identifies us as believers.  You know a fig tree by its figs.  You know a believer by their love.  Christ put it this way in John in John 13:35:

By this all will know that you are my Disciples, if you have love for one another.

So, love is Christ’s preeminent commandment (action) which transcends the law as the preeminent fruit of the Holy Spirit which is used to identify and individual as a true believer.  That seems like a lot.  But wait, there is more.  Love is also used to define God.  There aren’t many words which by themselves can be used to define God.  However, love is used in that very manner in 1 John 4:8

Beloved, let us love one another, for love is of God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God.  He who does not love does not know God, for God is love.

To say that God is love then is entirely accurate.  God then goes on to define the word which He used to define Himself.  Look in the second epistle of John at verse six.

And now I plead with you, lady, not as though I wrote a new commandment to you, but that which we have had from the beginning; that we love one another.  This is love, that we walk according to His (God’s) commandments.  This is the commandment, that as you have heard from the beginning, you should walk in it. 

Now we have a definition of love that we can sink our teeth into.  When God says I am to love my neighbor He is telling me to observe His statuettes and commandments in regards to that person.  How beautiful is that.  If you want to know how to love your spouse the way God intended all you have to do is live your life the way God told you to.  If I truly love someone God’s directions for what is holy and right are my guiding principles on my relationship to that person. 

This is a stark contrast to how many people view love today.  Many times I see people treat God’s law as if it were in total opposition to love.  How many times have you heard someone say, “Well I know what the Bible says.  But, God loves us and wants us to be happy.”  God does love us.  That’s why the Bible says what it says.  In His infinite love God wants what is best for us; not what makes us happy.  You see, God’s love is given to us in His Word; not in spite of it. 

What does that love look like in our lives?  The Apostle Paul describes it in his first letter to the Corinthian church.  In Chapter 13 Verses 4 thru 8 it’s given to us in this way:

Love suffers long and is kind; love does not envy; love does not parade itself, is not puffed up; does not behave rudely, does not rejoice in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, and endures all things.  Love never fails.

I fear that love, as described here, is almost unrecognizable by us today.  When I walk into churches today I see little suffering of any kind; much less long suffering.  In truth, I've seen people leave churches because they were asked to move seats.  “Can you believe what he said to me?” Our pastors encourage envy by promoting a gospel of prosperity.  “If you entreat God’s favor you will prosper (have material possessions).”  We as “Christians” today lack humility.  As a matter of opinion, some of the least humble and most rude people I know claim to be Christians.  Furthermore, we use love as an excuse to condone iniquity in someone’s life rather than speak God’s Truth.  “Well I know what the Bible says.  But, God wants us to love everybody,” is given as the common excuse for whatever sin we want to overlook.  We no longer bear anything.  We believe little of what God actually says and view all others with skeptical eyes.  I am to hope all things.  That hope is to include the redemptive work of sanctification in the lives of my fellow believers as well as God’s promise thereof.  These characteristics of love are missing from our lives.  They have been replaced with this world’s view of love.  The love our society boasts of today is one that is fickle, frail, and failed.  “We used to love each other,” or, “I fell in love with someone else,” are the death rattles of many a marriage today.  Our society’s love is one that fails continually.  This is not the love that God described.  It certainly isn’t the love He demonstrated for us.

But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.

Romans 5:8 describes not just what love looks like, but what it accomplishes.  Love redeems the one who is without merit.  Our churches are in need of that love.  Our homes are in need of that love.  My soul is redeemed by that love.